What happened:

While in port, the 3/E on our ship noticed the EGCS giving some alarms during the UMS rounds. Since the EGCS was not in use, he put the alarms in the off-scan (disable) mode.

On departure, while starting the EGCS, he noticed that the AE 3 damper and uptake valves were not operating in the auto mode. Hence, he operated these valves manually. He also forgot to put the disabled alarms back in the normal mode.

During the EGCS operation, the cooling sea water pump no. 1 tripped. The standby cooling SW pumps no. 2 and no. 3 did not start on auto. The EGCS temperature started rising but did not activate any alarm as it was disabled. The high temperature shut down system tripped the EGCS. However, since the AE3 uptake / bypass valves was on manual mode, it continued to allow the exhaust gas to flow through the EGCS.

The C/E sensed burning smell in his cabin and on investigating found the cooling SW pump had tripped. He manually started the pump immediately and operated the AE3 uptake / bypass valves manually to stop the flow of exhaust through the EGCS. The engineers then tried to put the EGCS back in operation, but the high differential back pressure alarm kept tripping the system.

On internal inspection, the scrubber packing bed (demister) elements were found melted thus blocking the flow of exhaust gas through it.

EGCS Make: FMS Inc, Type: Multi Stream U-Type Open Loop, Model: FMSI 145, Design Max Exhaust Gas Flow: 122,400 Kg/h, Combustion Unit Connected: 1X ME and 3 X Aux Engine.

Consequences:

  • Damage of EGCS / repair costs
  • Additional consumption of LSMGO

Causes:

  • Operating equipment without authority:

- Without informing the C/E, the 3/E operated the AE 3 damper / bypass valves manually and disabled the EGCS alarm system.

  • Lack of situational awareness and risk perception:

- The Chief Engineer failed to monitor the status of EGCS in operation with alarms inhibited and AE-3 damper valves in manual mode.

- The password for disabling the alarm system was available to all engineers.

  • Inadequate servicing of equipment:

- The AE3 damper valves were recommended for overhaul by the service engineer during a previous inspection. However, no efforts were made to carry out the maintenance.

  • Inadequate product design and verification:

- The SW pump variable frequency drive (VFD) and EGCS control systems were inadequately configured for safe operation. The no.1 tripped due to VFD high temperature and the standby SW pumps failed to start though it was on Auto mode.

  • The EGCS system was running on one SW cooling pump in auto operation whereas the makers recommend two SW pumps.

Lessons learnt:

  • If any alarm is put on repose (disabled), ensure that:

- It is done only with permission from the Chief engineer.

- A risk assessment is carried out.

- Details are recorded in the UMS checklist.

  • Check the EGCS system configuration on your ship for safe operations. Ships fitted with FMSI manufactured scrubber must specifically verify for below:

- The SW pump motor VFD is provided with additional cooling to prevent overheating.

- To standardize the maximum frequency and the limiting current on the VFD.

- All maintenance and modification of the damper valves as per makers / service engineers’ guidelines are complied with.

  • Protect Alarm monitoring systems (AMS) with passwords. The CE must change the password periodically and not share it with others to prevent unauthorized access.
  • Ensure that all alarms and trips as per makers manuals are included in the ships PMS and tested at the schedule intervals.

RELATED BSM Insight

BSM Smart Academy expanding its partner network
BSM Smart Academy expanding its partner network

The BSM Smart Academy has gained two more universities for its programme: the King Abdulaziz University in Saudi Arabia and the Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport in Egypt. This brings the partner network of the BSM Smart Academy, which was only launched by the BSM in April 2024, to six maritime institutions. BSM is also in cooperation talks with other universities.

The potential of Carbon Capture and Storage for the shipping industry
The potential of Carbon Capture and Storage for the shipping industry

Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is a safe and efficient way to handle emissions and meet climate targets. And it offers beneficial opportunities for the shipping industry in gaining new business and reducing its own carbon footprint, Johan Lillieskold, Gas Solutions Specialist at Schulte Group, is convinced.

EU ETS: It's time to act
EU ETS: It's time to act

On 1 January 2024, shipping officially joined the European Union’s Emission Trading System (EU ETS). With it emerged a comprehensive set of responsibilities, accompanied by significant financial implications for shipping companies who, for the first time, are included in a market-based measure such as EU ETS. The increased level of interaction between the European Commission and the shipping industry means a novelty for both parties - and an ongoing learning process.